As terence penelhum has noted, many philosophers feel it is somehow a professional obligation not to accept it. In conclusion, pascals wager, while an interesting piece of philosophical thought, should have no place in a christians evangelistic and apologetic repertoire. Pascals wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenthcentury french philosopher, mathematician and physicist, blaise pascal 16231662. Examining two objections to pascals wager pascals wager has been the subject of protracted philosophical interest since its posthumous appearance over three centuries ago. The flaws of pascals wager an argument often used by religious people is that they have nothing to lose by believing in god and that atheists are risking eternity in hell for no gain. Christians are to share and proclaim the gospel of jesus christ, which alone is the power of god for salvation to everyone who believes romans 1. Two main objections are often raised to pascals wager. Pascals wager about god internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Pascals wager does not define which god to believe in since in many religions believing in a different god brings a punishing judgment. It posits that humans bet with their lives that god either exists or does not pascal argues that a rational person should live as though god exists and seek to believe in god.
Jan 02, 2020 in conclusion, pascals wager, while an interesting piece of philosophical thought, should have no place in a christians evangelistic and apologetic repertoire. Sep 28, 2015 most discussions of pascals wager take it as a peculiar if not perverse calculation of selfinterest. Taking pascals wager by michael rota overdrive rakuten. Pascals wager is about faith in god where there is no conclusive evidence possible. Internet archive contributor internet archive language english. But if there were three lives to gain, you would have to play since you. Therefore, pascal s wager is logically invalid if you must already assume its conclusion, e. Pascals wager, discussed in his pensees, has provoked discussion and. This is a plausible principle, and one which is employed in some versions of pascals wager.
And then to make people seek him among the philosophers, sceptics, and dogmatists, who disquiet him who inquires of them. Pascals wager suffers from the logical fallacy of false dilemma, relying on the assumption that the only possibilities are that the christian god exists or that no god exists. It is also one of the first tries to use the concept of infinity, and the first use of decision theory. It is in this work that we find what is known as pascals wager. Very few of the wager s defenders, in fact, have retained more than an academic interest in its power to persuade. God exists, then our return is infinite for the value. Rota considers pascal s wager and the roles of uncertainty, evidence and faith in making a commitment to god. Pascal s w ager over the course of history, many arguments have. Our soul has been cast into the body, where it finds number, time and dimension. Its argument is rooted in what has subsequently become known as game theory. You have two things to lose, the true and the good. William james noted that those who engaged in such egotistic reasoning might be among the first that.
Pascals wager edited by paul bartha cambridge university press. It seems just possible that in the latter edition, and also in his biographical study pascal. Pascals wager or pascals gambit the name for an idea that blaise pascal had. Pascals wager is the name given to an argument due to blaise pascal for believing, or for at least taking steps to believe, in god. Since you must choose, let us see which interests you least. This is an effect that simply relies on nothing more than an ordinary cellphone calculator and an oscarwinning performance. That is, to say, it is an objection to versions of the wager that argue that its always decision theoretically rational to wager that god exists.
The wager by blaise pascal certainly true of every finite number. These parts show that one of the main assumptions of pascals wager, that we cannot know the truth or falsity or religious claims and are thus forced to make a wager, is false. Pascals wager is the most famous part of his collection of notes known as the pensees. As we have mentioned above, there is a moral dimension to pascals wager. Sep 12, 20 in defence of pascals wager pascals wager in. Pascals wager pascals wager is named after blaise pascal, a french mathematician, physicist, and philosopher. Taken this way, the argument seems morally suspect. Most philosophers think pascals wager is the weakest of all arguments for believing in the existence of god. Id like to believe that buffet is just innocently dumb, but, i think he is more likely disgustingly crafty, here. But, as pascal notes, this fact does not remove the necessity of our having to decide to believe, or not believe, in god.
Rota considers pascals wager and the roles of uncertainty, evidence and faith in making a commitment to god. I propose to reformulate pascals wager as urging those who doubt gods existence to embrace a doubt of desire rather than a doubt of indifference. Blaise pascal 16231662 offers a pragmatic reason for believing in god. Pascals wager inthis article i consider the many gods objection to pascals wager. Pascal lived in the 17th century, which was a time of great skepticism agnosticism in europe this era is usually referred to as the enlightenment. Pascals wager, socalled because it was devised by the brilliant catholic philosopher blaise pascal 16231662, is an apologetics method in the form of a wager aimed at getting atheists and agnostics to consider the possibility that god exists and that there is a heaven and hell. Pascal, who is said to be the father of modern probability, felt that that religion should be approached as a gamble. If the christian god does not exist, the agnostic loses little by believing in him and gains correspondingly little by not believing. It was this time that the wager was formulated and it was not published in his lifetime. The name is somewhat misleading, for in a single section of his pensees, pascal apparently presents at least three such arguments, each of which might be called a wagerit is only the final of. After all, suppose one were to come up with an argument which convinced you that the truth of theism is quite unlikely indeed. May 06, 2012 the flaws of pascals wager an argument often used by religious people is that they have nothing to lose by believing in god and that atheists are risking eternity in hell for no gain.
Mar 17, 2009 pascal s wager is actually a serious problem for those of us who want to use kolmogorov complexity as an occam prior, because the size of even the finite computations blows up much faster than their probability diminishes see here. Warren buffet, climate change and pascals wager watts up. Pascals wager is actually a serious problem for those of us who want to use kolmogorov complexity as an occam prior, because the size of even the finite computations blows up much faster than their probability diminishes see here. If the christian god does exist, the agnostic gains. Only nontheists go to heaven 2002, but she does not understand my argument. If god existed, and the person believed in god, he would be rewarded with happiness forever. By engaging with themes such as decision theory, the finetuning of the universe, divine hiddenness, the problem of evil, the historicity of the resurrection and the nature of miracles, he probes the many dynamics at work in embracing. Richard carrier has not ended the wager in all forms, as he claims, because he assumes that the nature of heaven is completely different from what.
Pascals claim that if you lose, you lose nothing is some indication that he thought that belief dominated non belief. Its difficult to ignore the possibility that pascal took the wager quite seriously. Amy sayers responds to my essay the end of pascals wager. Pascals other wager this is a card miracle you can perform anytime, anywhere, without a deck of cards. The project gutenberg ebook of pascals pensees, by blaise. Feb 28, 2016 he is misusing pascals wager to raise the precautionary fallacy. Pascals wager was very important for the time, because it did new things with probability theory. Pascals wager or pascals gambit is the name for an idea that blaise pascal had. A carriage upset or overturned, according to the meaning to spread abroad or upset, according to the meaning. Pascals wager, jordan argued, may be viewed as a kind of last ditch argument for apologists and theism 24. It s difficult to ignore the possibility that pascal took the wager quite seriously. Pascal is supposed to have pitched his wager at folks who understand only selfinterested.
Such selfseeking individuals would not properly serve the deity. No one calls another a cartesian but he who is one himself, a pedant but a pedant, a provincial but a provincial. The wager takes on added weight when you consider that pascal himself made a bet and took up an ascetic lifestyle near the end of his life. In that case, pascals wager provides a rational reason to continue to believe in god. If there is a god, he is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, he has no affinity to us. By doing so providers can better ensure that the true values and preferences of patients are upheld. Since there is an equal risk of gain and of loss, if you had only to gain two lives, instead of one, you might still wager. Mar 24, 2017 in this wireless philosophy video, susanna rinard harvard university explains pascal s wager, blaise pascal s famous argument for belief in god. A qualified defense of pascals wager find, read and cite all the. Pascals wager has fascinated philosophers far in excess of its reputation as effective apologetics.
Warren buffet, climate change and pascals wager watts. May 23, 2016 today we conclude our unit on philosophy of religion and hank gets a little help from indiana jones to explain religious pragmatism and pascals wager, fideism, and kierkegaards leap to faith. More particularly, it objects to the principle that an. Jul 28, 2014 pascals wager, jordan argued, may be viewed as a kind of last ditch argument for apologists and theism 24. In defence of pascals wager just another philosopher. The conduct of god, who disposes all things kindly, is to put religion into the mind by. Pascals wager, practical argument for belief in god formulated by blaise pascal. As terence penelhum has noted, many philosophers feel it is. Christians are to share and proclaim the gospel of jesus christ, which alone is the power of. Request pdf on mar 28, 2016, paul boaheng and others published gambling on god. Pascals wager is an argument for the existence of god developed by 17th century mathematician and philosopher blaise pascal. Pascal is here expressing a kind of skepticism about the ability of human reason to tell us whether there is a god. Hence it comes that, if there are as many risks on one side as on the other, the course is to play even.
This does not excuse a person from at least trying to discover if there is a god or not and who he might be. Today we conclude our unit on philosophy of religion and hank gets a little help from indiana jones to explain religious pragmatism and pascals wager, fideism, and. In this wireless philosophy video, susanna rinard harvard university explains pascals wager, blaise pascals famous argument for belief in god. Drange the argument call it pw may be formulated as follows.
A live hypothesis is a proposition whose adoption would not. Nicholas resellers book is distinctive in that it takes pascal seriously as a philosopher in light. Denial of god means that i simply close the door on the hope that there is something beyond the natural world. It was important for other philosophers who developed the ideas of pragmatism and voluntarism. The wager blaise pascal blaise pascal 16231662 was a french scientist and mathematician who experienced a religious conversion during the night of november 23rd, 1654 at the age of 31. He is misusing pascals wager to raise the precautionary fallacy. Pascal s wager has fascinated philosophers far in excess of its reputation as effective apologetics.
Pascals wager is an argument that asserts that one should believe in god, even if gods existence cannot be proved or disproved through reason blaise pascals original wager was as a fairly short paragraph in pensees amongst several other notes that could be considered wagers. Therefore, in no form of pascal s wager can we grant the assumptions that sayers wants. The wager cannot rule out the possibility that there is a god who instead rewards skepticism and punishes blind faith, for example. He said that it is not possible to prove or disprove that god exists. See bostrom on infinite ethics for how much worse things get if you allow nonhalting turing machines.